"Raymond’s eye for telling detail is very fine, as one expects of an accomplished writer, but to this she adds the informing eye of a natural historian of place.”
— John Keeble, author of Nocturnal America
Midge Raymond
Midge’s blog about writing . . . reading . . . and everything in between

Taking fiction off life support

This LA Times blog post titled “Fiction is dead. Again?” was accompanied by a gripping image: a hearse. This photo  sums up this topic so well: every few years, someone somewhere claims that fiction is dead. And then we all move on.

Yet each time, the notion seems a little more alarming.

In this Mother Jones article, Ted Genoways, editor of the Virginia Quarterly Review, writes about the struggles of literary magazines to keep publishing amid declining subscribers and “an even greater dent in their cultural relevance.” The most interesting statistics in this article are those that add up to one simple fact: today’s writers are not reading. In other words, they are not supporting the literary magazines to which they submit.

Earlier this year, the New York Times covered the struggle of Harper’s magazine, another sad story in the fiction world (the Atlantic has already ceased publishing monthly fiction).  In order to keep readers and draw new ones, many prestigious journals are offering online content in addition to the print editions — Mississippi Review, Missouri Review, Harvard Review, and AGNI among them — while others, such as TriQuarterly and Shenandoah, have been forced to go exclusively online. As Genoways notes, many magazines facing deep cuts or extinction are among the best.

The LA Times post, in response to Lee Siegel’s Observer piece calling fiction “culturally irrelevant,” this post outlines in detail — from the book-based “Twilight” craze to the lively conversations generated by The New Yorker’s “20 Under 40″ list — why fiction doesn’t need a hearse just yet. But if readers don’t support the books and magazines that keep it alive, its future may be more tenuous than we’d like to believe. On The Huffington Post, Anis Shivani chats with the editors of seventeen literary journals that he thinks will survive the digital age. It’s good to see, amid the challenges, that most of the editors are hopeful about keeping their magazines going — and of course I hope the list of journals that survive and thrive goes well beyond these seventeen.

In this economy, it’s hard to justify the extras that many of us need to go without right now. But if you’re a fiction reader — and especially if you’re a fiction writer — this is the time to support these magazines in any way you can. If you give up only one month’s worth of lattes, you can subscribe to a literary magazine. If you enter a contest, you’re supporting a literary magazine or a small press. If you can’t afford a subscription, buy a journal at an independent bookstore, supporting both bookstore and the journal. We all have to make trade-offs in a poor economy — but for writers, these are choices that could make a big difference for the future of our work.

Reading: Taking fiction off life supportTweet this post on Twitter

Subscribe to Remembering English

2 comments

1 mickey { 08.16.10 at 8:09 pm }

For me, literary journals are a necessity. Without them, I would not have found out about some of the very best short story writers in America. I read Glimmer Train, TinHouse, Bellingham Review, and Agni regularly. Unless I know a certain bookseller (and his or her tastes), buying story collections based on either their opinions or published reviews is always a crapshoot.

There were some interesting comments on the HuffPo piece. One person observed that the Iowa Review is the westernmost journal to have been cited. Another good point, IMO, is that so many of the journals are attached to university MFA programs — a situation that invites cliqueishness. Glimmer Train, on the other hand, is an independently run journal that is always at the top of my list for great new writing. Case in point: If I’m ever able to write anything as beautiful and quietly searing as Karen Outen’s story, “Inside the Universe of His Parents,” I will feel that I have been worthy!

An interesting take on the battles of independent bookstores is in today’s NYT:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/17/books/17indie.html

2 Midge { 08.17.10 at 9:26 am }

Mickey, I agree completely — I too love literary journals, and because of the diversity of content they can be even better reads than collections (and I say this as the author of one!). And thanks for the link to the NYT piece … definitely an interesting take on the battle of the indie bookstores (and quite troubling, on several levels!).

Leave a Comment