The dangers of polar travel

By Midge Raymond,

  Filed under: Antarctica, Environment, My Last Continent, News, Oceans, Penguins

As the ice melts in the Arctic, tour companies are taking advantage of the ability to bring tourists to the region like never before. As I noted in this article for The Daily Beast, “despite all our technological advances, a ship is only as safe as her captain—and the capricious nature of ice and polar weather means even an experienced captain isn’t immune from human error.”

And due to these new opportunities, tour companies like the one that owns the luxury cruise ship Crystal Serenity, are taking advantage. Yet when it comes to polar cruises, bigger is most certainly not better. This article in The Guardian (titled “A new Titanic?”) made the point very clearly: “If something were to go wrong it would be very, very bad.”

And another article, in the Telegraph (titled “The world’s most dangerous cruise?”) reported: “In 2010 it took a Canadian icebreaker 40 hours to evacuate just 120 passengers from the 330ft Clipper Adventurer when it ran aground on an underwater cliff. At times, Serenity will be 1,000 miles and at least 11 hours’ response time from coast guard assistance.”

In other words, this cruise was extremely risky — and while its voyage was successful, the risks will increase if this type of tourism becomes a trend.

In the last 15 years, cruise-ship tourism in Norway has grown from 200,000 to almost 700,000 visitors. Canada’s fleet of passenger vessels was 11 in 2005 and rose to 40 in 2015. Iceland’s foreign tourists have more than tripled since the year 2000, to nearly a million visitors a year—about three times Iceland’s population. And in Antarctica, the number of visitors this season is expected to be upwards of 40,000—more than double what it was in 2004.

Can the planet’s most vulnerable places handle much more tourism?

As the Antarctic tour season begins next month, the concerns are similar to those of cruises in the Arctic; it’s an unpredictable place where there are not enough resources to rescue large numbers of passengers and crew were something to happen. Last year, a small tourist vessel was damaged by ice and, while all on board were safe, the company had to cancel its next voyage. It’s worth noting that this happened in the South Shetland Islands, which is pretty far north on an Antarctic cruise; in other words, ice is unpredictable even farther north and can wreak havoc on ships anytime and anywhere.

While Antarctic travel is considered safe (unlike these new uncharted voyages in the Arctic; as this Guardian article notes, “even before the Crystal Serenity began planning its voyage, the coast guard and local communities were raising concerns that the Arctic was not ready for the sharp rise in traffic through the Bering Strait”), all travelers should carefully vet their tour operators, most of which follow the guidelines of IAATO, and choose a company with vast experience in ice-filled waters. The Southern Ocean is highly unpredictable, and an experienced captain, crew, and staff makes all the difference — not only for the safety of passengers but for wildlife as well.




  Comments: 2

  1. I agree, Graeme — the increase in travel to the poles is staggering! And I’m particularly worried about Antarctica as well. On the one hand, I think the small expedition ships that provide educational journeys can be wonderful (I visited on one of those expeditions, and it was life-changing), but I’m deeply concerned about the “adventure travel,” which is not based on an appreciation for the continent or the wildlife but purely for thrills, and this isn’t at all good for the environment. And with countries continuing to build bases, territorial claims are an issue as well … one reason I’m glad to have MY LAST CONTINENT in the world is the hope that it’ll help people see what a valuable part of the planet this is and how much it needs protecting. Thanks so much for reading and for your thoughts!

  2. I worry about the continued increase in polar travel. As an OAE (1968-69) I’m particularly concerned about Antarctica. Fifty-odd years ago it was seen as a place for science but what is it today? Yes, science continues but tourist ships, adventurists and “cycling” trips to the pole, marathons, new bases…where is it all headed. Countries cannot agree on protecting the Ross Sea marine environment. How far away are territorial claims?